US Appeals Court Blocks Plea Deal for Accused 9/11 Mastermind

A divided US appeals court on Friday rejected plea agreements that would have allowed Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the alleged architect of the September 11, 2001, attacks, and two co-defendants to plead guilty and avoid the death penalty. The 2-1 ruling by the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit derails efforts to resolve a military prosecution at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, mired in over two decades of legal stalemate.

The plea deals, initially offered in 2024 and approved by the overseer of the Pentagon’s Guantanamo war court, were rescinded in August by then-Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin following backlash from Republican lawmakers. A military judge later ruled that Austin lacked the authority to cancel the agreements, a decision upheld by the US Court of Military Commission Review in December, prompting scheduled plea hearings. However, the Biden administration, followed by the Trump administration, challenged this ruling, leading the DC Circuit to pause proceedings and ultimately side with Austin’s authority.

In the majority opinion, Judges Patricia Millett (an Obama appointee) and Neomi Rao (a Trump appointee) stated that Austin “indisputably had legal authority” to withdraw the plea agreements. They emphasized that the Defense Secretary’s decision prioritized the “families and the American public” by preserving the possibility of full military commission trials. In contrast, Judge Robert Wilkins (also an Obama appointee) dissented, calling the ruling “stunning” and arguing that the court should have respected the military courts’ interpretation of their own rules.

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, held at Guantanamo Bay since 2002, is accused of orchestrating the 9/11 attacks, which saw hijacked commercial planes crash into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, killing nearly 3,000 people. His co-defendants, Mustafa Ahmed Adam al Hawsawi and Walid Muhammad Salih Mubarak bin ‘Atash, also faced the now-revoked plea deals. Matthew Engle, an attorney for bin ‘Atash, indicated that an appeal, potentially to the US Supreme Court, is under consideration. Representatives for Mohammed and Hawsawi, as well as the Pentagon, did not immediately comment.

The ruling prolongs the legal saga at Guantanamo, established under President George W. Bush to detain foreign militant suspects post-9/11, leaving the fate of these high-profile cases uncertain as the pursuit of military trials continues.

  • Related Posts

    PKK Fighters Symbolically Destroy Weapons in Iraqi Kurdistan, Signaling Peace Process

    In a historic ceremony held Friday in Iraqi Kurdistan, 30 fighters from the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) publicly destroyed their weapons, marking a pivotal moment in the group’s transition from…

    Continue reading
    France Unveils Groundbreaking Agreement for New Caledonia’s Future

    In a landmark decision, France has reached a transformative agreement with New Caledonia, ensuring the Pacific territory remains part of the French Republic while establishing it as a distinct state.…

    Continue reading

    World News

    US Appeals Court Blocks Plea Deal for Accused 9/11 Mastermind

    PKK Fighters Symbolically Destroy Weapons in Iraqi Kurdistan, Signaling Peace Process

    France Unveils Groundbreaking Agreement for New Caledonia’s Future

    Google Secures Windsurf Talent in $2.4 Billion AI Coding Deal

    xAI Targets $200 Billion Valuation in Upcoming Funding Round, Reports FT

    OpenAI Postpones Open Model Release Amid Safety Concerns

    Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 & Z Flip 7 Series: Bold Upgrades, Smarter Prices, Wider Reach

    Ecuador Fights Back to Hold Uruguay 2-2 in Women’s Copa América Opener

    Haseebullah Khan and Mohammad Shehzad Share Cryptic Posts After Shaheens Omission

    Ancient Interstellar Visitor 3I/Atlas May Be the Oldest Known Comet